The Intersection of Law and Sports: Insights from a New York Media Lawyer

New York lawyer on her start in the business, the relationship between sports and law and journalism, British mysteries and more.

Appeared in Media Law Monthly, April 10, 2026

By Rebecca Hughes Parker

PUBLISHED IN: MediaLawLetter March 2026

TOPICS : Career Development

New York lawyer on her start in the business, the relationship between sports and law, British mysteries and more.

Rebecca Hughes Parker is an attorney in Dentons’ Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice in New York.

1. How did you get interested in journalism and media law?

I cannot remember a time when I was not interested in journalism and politics. In middle school, I asked for subscriptions to the New York Times, Newsweek, Time, and our local Long Island Newsday so I could read each morning. My mother obliged on the condition that I babysat my five younger siblings and, later, that I help drive them.

I started writing for my high school newspaper and ultimately became editor-in-chief, spending countless hours assigning and editing stories and laying out the paper on early desktop-publishing software. In college, the newspaper was my first stop as well, and I became the managing editor of the weekly publication, where feature-length reporting let us dig into campus issues.  I loved reporting. I still remember the cafeteria worker strikes, a contentious Senate race, university email crash, and a 24-inch snowfall that did not cancel classes. I remember a spirited op-ed defending figure skating as a real sport. During summers, I interned at ABC News. After college, I spent time in local broadcast news, and then in law school I worked on Dan Abrams’ legal show at MSNBC. Those experiences showed me different scales of operations and different ways to tell stories.

As for the law, my late father has always been my inspiration.  He was a standout student and hockey player from Canada. A first-generation college graduate, he loved practicing law, especially tax law, if you can believe it, but he was intellectually curious about everything, and clients sought him out for a wide variety of advice. We debated all sorts of legal concepts and current events for as long as I can remember.

2. What was it like coming into law after journalism, and then returning as outside counsel after time in-house?

Moving from journalism to litigation felt natural because the core skills overlap. Building a coherent narrative for a brief or a trial echoes the work of constructing a long-form article or an investigative segment. You gather facts and then present what matters in the clearest sequence you can. The discipline of editing—cutting what does not serve the theme—translates directly to legal writing. I recall relying on the interview skills I honed in journalism for the first major deposition I took.

My time outside of a firm also has shaped my perspective.  After my first stint at Dentons in litigation, I managed lawyer–journalist teams in a premium legal subscription business, and wrote and edited a lot myself. That experience taught me the operational and editorial pressures that media and data-driven companies face.  Later, as in-house counsel following an acquisition, I advised reporters, editors, and analysts under real deadlines and real budgets.  I learned to calibrate risk to the company’s mission, not to an abstract ideal.

Rejoining outside counsel practice at Dentons in 2023, I brought that operational wisdom and empathy with me.

My late father has always been my inspiration.  He was a standout student and hockey player from Canada. A first-generation college graduate, he loved practicing law, especially tax law, if you can believe it, but he was intellectually curious about everything, and clients sought him out for a wide variety of advice.

3. Best advice you have ever received?

A legal career is long—often 40 years—and it does not have to be linear or conform to a single, well-trodden path.

My two years in local news gave me valuable real-world experience before law school. Then, just three months after I started in litigation at Dentons the first time, I gave birth to premature twins. I was a brand new lawyer and brand new mother of two all at once. My husband was a fantastic primary caregiver, but motherhood did complicate things, to put it mildly. I had a third kid six years later while still at Dentons.

My path was not traditional, and that made me nervous at times, but a long career affords room for detours. I learned that breadth has been a strength, not a liability.

On the ice with my twins and sister Emily in 2009

4. Coming from a family of Olympians (and as a trained athlete yourself), what life lessons did you learn from sports?

Studies consistently show that a large share of senior women leaders were competitive athletes, which does not surprise me.  Sports are empowering, especially for women working in male-dominated environments. At U.S. law firms, for example, women still make up under a quarter of equity partners despite comprising about half of associates.

I figure skated growing up, competing individually and on a synchro team. I played a variety of other sports at different times, like lacrosse and track and tennis. I taught skating in college, as well as aerobics and strength classes. Athletics taught me the value of hard work, of teamwork, and of practical problem-solving combined with the importance of resilience. A connective tissue disorder has led to many injuries. I had to learn to get up, adjust my plan, and keep going.

Further, athletics teaches you how to perform under pressure. My sisters – Sarah who competed and won gold in figure skating at the 2002 Salt Lake City Olympics and Emily who competed in the 2006 Torino Olympics – had to stand alone on the ice before millions of spectators and a panel of judges. They had to trust their training and judgment. From a young age, we all learned that innate trust.

Family collage, 2001

5. What are the media law and First Amendment issues that keep you up at night?

There are many, unfortunately. The through line is the chilling of speech. Overt threats by public officials to punish disfavored coverage are obvious red flags, and we are hearing those frequently. “Journalism is printing what someone else does not want printed; everything else is public relations,” George Orwell said, and it seems many just want the latter.

The constant rhetorical attacks on the press can be corrosive in subtler ways, conditioning audiences to distrust journalism and pressuring newsrooms to pull punches.  

Speech is being chilled in educational settings as well.  Book removals and restrictions on curriculum send a message to teachers and librarians that it is safer to avoid contested topics, even when those materials are pedagogically sound.  I have been so lucky to work with many talented lawyers on these issues. Notably, I had the opportunity to learn from Michael Bamberger, a lion of the First Amendment bar, who has done so much to protect free expression in his over six decades practicing law (talk about a long career). I could not imagine a better mentor.

The hardest part is that the damage can outlast any single administration.  Once policies, enforcement priorities, or even informal norms reset around hostility to speech, institutions internalize the risk.  

6. Favorite law-themed book, movie, or show?

“My Cousin Vinny” is a classic. It obviously takes many liberties, but somehow it captures real courtroom dynamics. I love that there are really no bad guys – just the legal system and Vinny figuring it out.

7. Favorite sports-themed book, movie, or show?

 “Miracle” is still my go-to sports movie for how it captured that magical 1980 win. I also have to mention “The Mighty Ducks” for putting a determined female goalie in front of a generation of viewers. Representation matters, and girls notice. I am biased, of course, as my youngest daughter is a goalie, another position in sports that requires a calm mindset  in high-pressure situations.

As for books, “The Game” by the late Ken Dryden, a good friend of the family, is as much about leadership, culture, and the psychology of performance as it is about hockey.

8. Any unusual hobbies?

I love mysteries. I like to wind down at night with British “cozy” mystery shows—the kind that make you wonder how many people can possibly be murdered in small villages in the English countryside or on the English coast.

9. Where do you get your news?

I try to vary my sources deliberately so I do not get trapped in an echo chamber.  At home, we watch cable news—both my husband and I have worked in that world and understand the rhythms. I follow reporters and legal analysts on social platforms to see emerging stories before they harden into conventional wisdom. I read a handful of major newspapers daily and a rotating suite of newsletters that cover media law, privacy, technology, and politics, including MLRC’s MediaLawDaily, of course.

I also read about women’s health because unfortunately, getting good care takes a lot of knowledge and empowered questions to doctors.

10. Travel bucket list?

In addition to spinal surgery, in 2025, I underwent treatment for breast cancer and I promised myself that once I healed, I would make time for more travel. I have never been to Ireland or France, so those are certainly places I would like to see. I spent one day in the countryside in the Cotswolds in England a few years ago, and would like to go back. Hopefully, no murders while I am there.

Women’s Hockey Belongs at Center Ice in the Olympics

Update to the below: gold medal for both the men’s and women’s hockey teams, both in overtime 2-1 games with unbelievable goaltending.

**

We’ve come a long way on gender equity in sports — and it’s been incredible to witness. And still, I want more.

The Olympics have always been part of my life. My first Games were the Calgary 1988 Winter Olympics, thanks to my hockey-playing Canadian dad who had all six of us on the ice almost daily growing up (we all loved it). Years later, my family stood on Olympic ice in a different way — my sisters competing in figure skating at the Salt Lake 2002 Winter Olympics and the Torino 2006 Winter Olympics.

Now I’m a figure skating and hashtag#hockey mom, watching my goalie daughter and her teammates grow up in a world with more opportunity and visibility than ever before. There was no hashtag#womenshockey event until 1998. As four-time Olympian Angela Ruggiero Ruggiero has shared, she came home to no post-Olympic tour, no pro league, and little pay — even paying taxes on a modest medal bonus.

The progress in women’s hockey is real. The speed, skill, physicality — it’s elite sport, period. Packed arenas for the new PWHL. Momentum driven by so many leaders and advocates, including the Women’s Sports Foundation. And most importantly, young girls who no longer question whether they belong.

But parity isn’t just about participation. It’s also about framing.
A few things that still matter:

–It’s women’s hockey and men’s hockey, not “hockey” and “women’s hockey.” Language shapes perception.

–It’s wonderful to see partners and kids supporting women athletes at the Games. But dads caring for their children aren’t “troopers” or doing something completely out of the ordinary. They’re parents.

–Women’s hockey is compelling on its own. It doesn’t need repeated in-game interviews with male players to validate it.

–And when possible (a tough one), let’s not schedule the women’s gold medal hockey game opposite the women’s figure skating long program. We can celebrate more than one women’s event at a time.

None of this diminishes how far we’ve come. In fact, it reflects how high the standard now is. Let’s go USA.

Recovering and reframing

Recovery from lumbar spinal fusion to fix a collapsed disc on the heels of breast cancer surgery and radiation and at the beginning of hormone therapy 0/10 – don’t recommend, very difficult. The support of remarkable family, friends, co-workers, and health care providers during this journey (especially on this #CancerSurvivorsDay my mom Amy Hughes, a stage 3 breast cancer survivor herself for 27 years) 10/10 priceless.

Health issues like this are humbling, and to paraphrase Zoe Neale Hurston, there are periods in your life that ask questions and periods that answer. This one has a lot of questions. In December, looking down the barrel of what was coming, I decided that my word of 2025 would be “reframe.” I was thinking of my late father, who was a perennial optimist. He always saw the best in every situation, and tried to get me, often an anxious overthinker, to see it too. I’ll drop in another quote (Hemingway): “The world breaks everyone, and afterward, some are strong at the broken places.”

Strengthening the broken place is hard; recovery is two steps forward and one step back and full of frustrations. But, to reframe: I was able to support the interfaith nutrition network (INN, one of my parents’ favorite charities); the Port Washington Public Library, where I’m on FOL – The Friends of the Port Washington Public Library board and various local causes – all in sneakers and measured movements and more rest than I would like.

I spent my birthday in the hospital, and appreciate all of the birthday wishes – a very belated thank you for those. And of course thanks to my adorable little nieces (and their parents) who make it easier to keep the smiles in the frame and who keep me young. I am facing 48 with a (literal) spine of steel!

Supreme Court Avoids Narrowing Section 230

In a recent client alert at Dentons, my colleagues and I explored two recent Supreme Court cases about whether Twitter and Google are liable for third-party content on their sites under the much-debated Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.

https://www.dentons.com/en/insights/alerts/2023/june/12/supreme-court-avoids-narrowing-section-230?utm_source=email&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=vuture

Doctor Who, Jill Biden?

Update: I wrote the below in May 2013 in response to a National Review article. The issue is ripe again with a December 11, 2020 op-ed in the WSJ, making mostly the same argument, complete with calling Dr. Biden kiddo. Sexist tropes are very slow to die.

***

Doctor Who? No, not Dr. Who.

“Doctor Who?” is what the National Review Online asks about Dr. Jill Biden, wife of the Vice President.

Apparently, that well-regarded think-tank takes issue with such insistence upon a professional distinction. In the article entitled, “Diagnosing Dr. Biden: The second lady exemplifies a bloated class of people with irrelevant, unimpressive titles,” we’re told that, “Dr. Biden isn’t a physician, of course. She has a doctorate – in ‘educational leadership,’ whatever the hell that is.”

Biting wit, to be sure. Continue reading Doctor Who, Jill Biden?